Analysis of the Effectiveness of Subsidy Policies on Household Purchasing Power

Authors

  • Jamaludin Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia Author
  • Wicaksono Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Economic Welfare, Household, Purchasing Power, Subsidy Policy, Welfare Improvement

Abstract

Subsidy policies are implemented by governments as an instrument to maintain economic stability and protect household welfare, particularly in facing rising prices and declining purchasing power. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of subsidy policies in improving household purchasing power and evaluating their impact on economic welfare. The research employs a quantitative approach using household survey data analyzed through descriptive statistics and regression analysis. The results indicate that subsidy policies have a significant positive effect on household purchasing power by reducing expenditure burdens and supporting consumption capacity. However, the effectiveness of subsidies depends on accurate targeting and efficient distribution mechanisms. This study concludes that well-designed subsidy policies can strengthen household economic resilience and contribute to sustainable welfare improvement

References

Anas, A., Martianto, D., & Dina, R. A. (2022). Estimasi dampak income shock terhadap konsumsi pangan rumah tangga di Kabupaten dan Kota Bogor. Jurnal Ilmu Gizi dan Dietetik, 1(1), 74–80.Björkegren, D., & Karaca, B. C. (2020). The effect of network adoption subsidies: Evidence from digital traces in Rwanda. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(3), 100–134.

Coady, D., Parry, I., Le, N. P., & Shang, B. (2021). Global fossil fuel subsidies remain large: An update based on country-level estimates. World Development, 145, 105495.

Dang, H. A. H., & Nguyen, C. V. (2021). Gender inequality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Income, expenditure, savings, and job loss. World Development, 140, 105296.

Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F., & Tsounta, E. (2021). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(2), 5–30.

Fiszbein, A., Schady, N., & Ferreira, F. H. G. (2020). Conditional cash transfers and household welfare outcomes in developing economies. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 68(4), 1001–1028.

Ghosh, S., & Vinod, D. (2022). Government transfers, household consumption and welfare improvement: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of Development Economics, 158, 102927.

Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2021). Universal basic incomes versus targeted transfers: Anti-poverty programs in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 13, 385–411.

Jappelli, T., & Pistaferri, L. (2021). Fiscal policy and household consumption responses during economic shocks. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(4), 1255–1290.

Kang, J. W., Tayag, M., & Sy, D. (2023). Consumption response to government income subsidies: Korea’s case. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 58(6), 1025–1043.

Karlan, D., Morten, M., & Zinman, J. (2020). Savings and household financial resilience after income transfers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(4), 755–769.

Klasen, S., & Fleurbaey, M. (2021). Social protection policies and household economic security during crises. Social Choice and Welfare, 57, 579–603.

Londoño-Vélez, J., Rodríguez, C., & Sánchez, F. (2021). The impact of government transfers on household welfare and inequality reduction. Journal of Development Studies, 57(8), 1306–1325.

Muralidharan, K., Niehaus, P., & Sukhtankar, S. (2021). General equilibrium effects of cash transfers in low-income economies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2397–2435.

Narayanan, S., & Gerber, N. (2020). Social protection programs and household food security outcomes: Evidence from developing countries. Food Policy, 95, 101945.

Pritchett, L., & Sandefur, J. (2021). The future of social assistance and poverty reduction policies. World Bank Research Observer, 36(2), 185–211.

Rasyid, M. (2022). Can unconditional cash assistance improve household welfare? QUAIDS model for food commodities in Indonesia. Development Studies Research, 9(1), 1–11.

Ravallion, M. (2020). On measuring global poverty and the effectiveness of anti-poverty policies. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 697–720.

Sánchez-Páramo, C., Hill, R., Gerszon Mahler, D., Narayan, A., & Yonzan, N. (2021). COVID-19 and poverty: Implications for social protection systems. World Development, 145, 105534.

Sato, Y., & Yamamoto, K. (2022). Household consumption responses to government support programs during economic uncertainty. Economic Modelling, 108, 105750.

Trisan, Y., & Sutrisna, I. K. (2022). Analisis pengaruh alat pembayaran menggunakan kartu (APMK), pendapatan nasional, dan inflasi terhadap konsumsi di Indonesia. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udayana, 11(1), 103–123.

Xiong, X., Yu, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). The impact of basic public services on residents’ consumption in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, Article 389.

Yang, J., & Chen, X. (2023). Government subsidies, household income stability and consumption expansion: Evidence from emerging economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 250–263.

Yusuf, A. A., & Sumner, A. (2021). Social assistance programs and household welfare during economic downturns. Journal of International Development, 33(5), 785–801.

Zhang, H., Wang, L., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Fiscal transfers, income inequality and household consumption behavior: Evidence from panel data analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 1250–1270

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Analysis of the Effectiveness of Subsidy Policies on Household Purchasing Power. (2026). Economy, Business, Finance, Accounting & Management Journal, 2(3), 75-81. https://pub.muzulab.com/index.php/EBFAM/article/view/149

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.