Implementation of environmentally friendly technology in sustainable construction projects

Rivaldo Gutasto; Hamda

Authors

Rivaldo Gutasto Universitas Putra Indonesia (UPI) YPTK Padang, Indonesia Author
Hamda Universitas Putra Indonesia (UPI) YPTK Padang, Padang, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Energy Efficiency, Green Building, Sustainable Construction, Waste Reduction

Abstract

Work accidents remain a significant concern in civil engineering projects, often resulting in delays, cost overruns, and reduced worker safety. This study aims to analyze the potential risks of work accidents in civil engineering projects using the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) method. HAZOP is a structured and systematic technique for identifying hazards and assessing their potential impact on project operations. Data were collected through site observations, interviews with safety officers, and review of project documentation on two ongoing civil engineering projects. The analysis focused on identifying deviations from standard operating procedures, potential causes, and their possible consequences. Results indicate that the most significant accident risks are associated with activities such as working at heights, heavy equipment operation, and material handling. Key contributing factors include inadequate use of personal protective equipment (PPE), insufficient worker training, and poor communication between project teams. The HAZOP assessment allowed categorization of risks into high, medium, and low levels, enabling targeted mitigation strategies. Recommendations include enhancing safety training programs, implementing stricter PPE enforcement, and establishing more effective hazard communication channels. The application of HAZOP proved effective in systematically identifying and prioritizing safety risks, offering valuable guidance for project managers to improve occupational safety management. These findings highlight the importance of integrating structured hazard analysis methods into safety planning for civil engineering projects

References

Abidin, N. Z., & Powmya, A. (2014). Perceptions on motivating factors and future prospects of green construction in Oman. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1), 231–239.

Ahn, Y. H., & Pearce, A. R. (2013). Green construction: Contractor experiences, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Green Building, 8(1), 149–164.

AlSanad, S. (2015). Awareness, drivers, actions, and barriers of sustainable construction in Kuwait. Procedia Engineering, 118, 969–983.

Azhar, S., Carlton, W. A., Olsen, D., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED® rating analysis. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 217–224.

Berardi, U. (2013). Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15, 1573–1591.

Bohari, A. A. M., Skitmore, M., Xia, B., Teo, M., & Adham, K. N. (2017). Green-oriented procurement for building projects: Preliminary findings from Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 690–700.

Bond, S. (2011). Barriers and drivers to green buildings in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 29(4/5), 494–509.

Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., Olanipekun, A. O., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2018). Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1067–1079.

Darko, A., Zhang, C., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Drivers for green building: A review of empirical studies. Habitat International, 60, 34–49.

Ding, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464.

Gardezi, S. S. S., Shafiq, N., & Din, M. I. (2015). Constraints in the implementation of sustainable construction practices in Malaysia. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 1–9.

Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Tookey, J., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Azhar, S., Efimova, O., & Raahemifar, K. (2017). Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1046–1053.

Häkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research & Information, 39(3), 239–255.

Hwang, B. G., & Tan, J. S. (2012). Green building project management: Obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 20(5), 335–349.

Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Kim, J., & de Dear, R. (2013). Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 18–26. Korkmaz, S., Riley, D., & Horman, M. (2010). Piloting evaluation metrics for sustainable high-performance building project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8), 877–885.Lam, P. T. I., & Chan, E. H. W. (2011). Enhancing productivity for green building construction projects: The use of innovative technologies. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 993–1004.

Li, Y., Chen, P. H., Chew, D. A. S., Teo, C. C., Ding, R. G., & Luo, X. (2011). Integrating design and construction through virtual prototyping. Automation in Construction, 20(5), 475–484.

Liu, Y., Guo, X., & Hu, H. (2014). Cost–benefit analysis on the implementation of sustainable construction in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 453–465.

Lu, Y., Li, Q., Chen, T., & Chan, X. (2018). A life-cycle assessment model for green building implementation in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 676–688.

Matar, M. M., Georgy, M. E., & Ibrahim, M. E. (2008). Sustainable construction management: Introduction of the operational context space (OCS). Construction Management and Economics, 26(3), 261–275. Murtaza, Q., Fisher, D., & Skibniewski, M. (1993). Knowledge-based approach to modular construction decision support. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(3), 473–491.

Ofori, G. (2015). Nature of the construction industry, its needs and its development: A review of four decades of research. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 20(2), 115–135.

Olanipekun, A. O., Xia, B., Hon, C., & Darko, A. (2017). Green building incentives: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1611–1621.

Pitt, M., Tucker, M., Riley, M., & Longden, J. (2009). Towards sustainable construction: Promotion and best practices. Construction Innovation, 9(2), 201–224.

Qi, G., Shen, L., Zeng, S., & Jorge, O. J. (2010). The drivers for contractors’ green innovation: An industry perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(14), 1358–1365.

Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010). Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1592–1600.

Robichaud, L. B., & Anantatmula, V. S. (2011). Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(1), 48–57.

Shen, L., Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, L., & Ji, Y. (2010). Project feasibility study: The key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(3), 254–259.

Tam, V. W. Y., & Lu, W. (2012). Construction waste management profiles, practices, and performance: A cross-jurisdictional analysis in four countries. Waste Management & Research, 30(11), 1076–1082.

United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). 2020 Global status report for buildings and construction: Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.

US Green Building Council. (2019). LEED v4 for building design and construction. Washington, DC: USGBC.

World Green Building Council. (2019). Bringing embodied carbon upfront: Coordinated action for the building and construction sector to tackle embodied carbon. London, UK: WGBC.

Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z. Y. (2014). Green building research–Current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281